ArtrellionAdvocacy Infrastructure for the Data-Driven Era

Letter to Reuters (Climate & Energy)

Per-tonne evidentiary disclosure is emerging as the next carbon-market design question

⚠ Pending personalisation. This outreach draft has not yet been assigned a named recipient with completed person + organisation + alignment analysis. Transmittal is blocked until a carbon_outreach_targets record is populated. See the personalisation standard.
To: Climate & Energy Editor, Reuters (Climate & Energy)
Bureau: 3 Times Square, New York, NY 10036
Beat: wire-service coverage of carbon markets and policy
Subject: Per-tonne evidentiary disclosure is emerging as the next carbon-market design question

Why this outlet

Reuters carries market-moving carbon-market coverage across 150+ newsrooms. A Reuters story on per-tonne evidentiary architecture sets the frame for every other outlet.

Letter

Dear Editor,

In January 2026, two Earth scientists — Christopher Reinhard of Georgia Tech and Noah Planavsky of Yale — published a paper in npj Climate Action arguing that carbon dioxide removal requires what they called radical transparency: open data on every claim's methodology, open data on every claim's dollar-per-tonne cost, and an independent verification pathway for every tonne.

The paper has begun to shape the conversation among academic critics of the voluntary carbon market — Barbara Haya at UC Berkeley, Danny Cullenward, Thales West at VU Amsterdam — and among policy bodies preparing EU and US regulatory frameworks for CDR.

Trellison Institute has been building a reference implementation of the paper's argument. The instrument is a signed per-tonne record that binds methodology attestation, sensor data, cost decomposition, environmental-impact disclosure, and audit hooks. The instrument is called a proof pack.

The reason Reuters readers should take notice: this is a market-structure story. If per-tonne evidentiary architecture becomes standard — through corporate procurement demand, registry adoption, or regulatory prescription — carbon markets move from opaque to legible. That affects pricing, volume, and the viability of specific pathways.

We are writing to offer Reuters an off-the-record briefing on the instrument, the research community evaluating it, and the timeline by which the EU CRCF and US federal procurement are likely to require per-tonne evidentiary disclosure.

We recognise wire-service readers span many jurisdictions and use cases. We would be glad to tailor a briefing to the specific regional desk that wants it.

Rob Stillwell
Director, Trellison Institute
[email protected]

Transmittal note: This is a Trellison draft prepared for review. Transmittal to the outlet requires governance approval and customisation to the outlet's current active correspondents and preferred submission format.
Disclosure: Trellison outreach draft. Not transmitted without explicit authorisation. Corrections: About.

← All editor letters · Release arsenal