ArtrellionAdvocacy Infrastructure for the Data-Driven Era

ISO Technical Committee 207 Audit Trail Documentation — Verification Chain of Custody

Prepared for ISO Technical Committee 207. Audit Trail Documentation. Draft in review.

ISO Technical Committee 207 Audit Trail Documentation — Verification Chain of Custody

Table of Contents

  1. [Introduction](#introduction)
  2. [Chain of Custody](#chain-of-custody)
  • 2.1 Overview
  • 2.2 Data Flow Diagram
  • 2.3 Roles and Responsibilities
  • 2.4 Data Collection
  • 2.5 Data Transmission
  • 2.6 Data Storage
  1. [Data Integrity](#data-integrity)
  • 3.1 Data Formats
  • 3.2 Data Integrity Checks
  • 3.3 Data Encryption
  1. [Timestamp Verification](#timestamp-verification)
  • 4.1 Timestamp Standards
  • 4.2 Synchronization Procedures
  1. [Tamper Detection](#tamper-detection)
  • 5.1 Tamper Detection Mechanisms
  • 5.2 Incident Response Procedures
  1. [Audit Log Format](#audit-log-format)
  • 6.1 Log Structure
  • 6.2 Log Retention Policy
  • 6.3 Access Control
  1. [Conformity Assessment Procedures](#conformity-assessment-procedures)
  2. [Conclusion](#conclusion)

1. Introduction

This document outlines the audit trail requirements for DaedArch Corporation's sensor-based Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) platform, which is designed to support compliance with the ISO 14064 and ISO 14065 standards. The purpose of this documentation is to ensure an end-to-end audit trail from sensor measurement through verification to credit issuance, thereby facilitating transparency, accountability, and integrity in carbon markets.

2. Chain of Custody

2.1 Overview

The chain of custody refers to the documented process that tracks the handling of data from its origin (sensor measurement) to its final destination (credit issuance). This section outlines the necessary components to establish a robust chain of custody.

2.2 Data Flow Diagram

` [IoT Sensor] --(Data Collection)--> [Data Processing Unit] --(Data Transmission)--> [Cloud Storage] --(Data Access)--> [Verification Body] --(Credit Issuance)--> [Carbon Market] `

2.3 Roles and Responsibilities

  • Data Collector: Responsible for the deployment and maintenance of IoT sensors.
  • Data Processor: Handles the processing of raw sensor data using certified algorithms.
  • Data Custodian: Oversees data storage and access controls.
  • Verification Body: Conducts validation and verification of GHG assertions based on processed data.
  • Carbon Market Operator: Issues carbon credits based on verified GHG reductions.

2.4 Data Collection

Data shall be collected from IoT sensors that comply with ISO 14064-1 standards. The sensors must record the following parameters:

  • Sensor ID: Unique identifier for each sensor (format: UUID).
  • Timestamp: UTC timestamp of the measurement (format: ISO 8601).
  • Measurement Value: Quantitative environmental data (format: decimal, e.g., CO2 concentration in ppm).
  • Location: Geographical coordinates (latitude and longitude, format: decimal degrees).

Example Data Structure: `json { "sensor_id": "e0b3e8e2-4c3e-4f4b-bd41-2b1d9b2e0f2a", "timestamp": "2023-10-01T12:00:00Z", "measurement_value": 400.5, "location": { "latitude": 34.0522, "longitude": -118.2437 } } `

2.5 Data Transmission

Data shall be transmitted to the Data Processing Unit (DPU) using secure protocols (e.g., HTTPS, MQTT). The API endpoint for data transmission shall be as follows:

API Endpoint: POST /api/v1/sensor-data

Request Body: The request body must conform to the JSON structure defined in Section 2.4.

2.6 Data Storage

Data shall be stored in a secure cloud-based storage solution that complies with ISO 27001 standards. The storage system shall implement access controls, encryption, and regular backups.

3. Data Integrity

3.1 Data Formats

Data shall be stored in a structured format (e.g., JSON, XML) to facilitate easy retrieval and processing. Each data entry must include:

  • Data Hash: SHA-256 hash of the data entry to ensure integrity.
  • Data Format Version: Versioning to track changes in data structure.

Example Data Structure: `json { "data_entry": { "sensor_id": "e0b3e8e2-4c3e-4f4b-bd41-2b1d9b2e0f2a", "timestamp": "2023-10-01T12:00:00Z", "measurement_value": 400.5, "location": { "latitude": 34.0522, "longitude": -118.2437 }, "data_hash": "3a1d4b7b3a2c3b7e8f2c3d3b3a2c3f3d4e5f6g7h8i9j0k1l2m3n4o5p6q7r8s", "data_format_version": "1.0" } } `

3.2 Data Integrity Checks

Data integrity shall be verified at multiple stages:

  • At Collection: Each data entry shall be hashed before transmission.
  • At Processing: The data hash shall be recalculated and compared to the original hash.
  • At Storage: Data integrity checks shall be performed daily using automated scripts.

3.3 Data Encryption

All data in transit and at rest shall be encrypted using industry-standard encryption protocols (e.g., AES-256 for data at rest, TLS 1.2 for data in transit).

4. Timestamp Verification

4.1 Timestamp Standards

Timestamps shall adhere to the ISO 8601 standard (e.g., 2023-10-01T12:00:00Z). All systems involved in data collection, processing, and verification shall synchronize their clocks using Network Time Protocol (NTP).

4.2 Synchronization Procedures

  • NTP Configuration: All devices shall be configured to synchronize with a reliable NTP server (e.g., time.google.com).
  • Verification Logs: A log of synchronization events shall be maintained for audit purposes, including the timestamp of the last successful synchronization.

5. Tamper Detection

5.1 Tamper Detection Mechanisms

Tamper detection mechanisms shall be implemented at various stages of the data lifecycle:

  • Sensor Level: Sensors shall include hardware-based tamper detection features (e.g., casing integrity checks).
  • Data Integrity Checks: As outlined in Section 3.2, data hashes shall be used to detect unauthorized changes.

5.2 Incident Response Procedures

In the event of a detected tampering incident, the following procedures shall be followed:

  1. Immediate Notification: Notify the Data Custodian and Verification Body.
  2. Data Isolation: Isolate affected data entries for further investigation.
  3. Root Cause Analysis: Conduct a thorough investigation to identify the cause of tampering.
  4. Documentation: Maintain detailed records of the incident, including timestamps and actions taken.

6. Audit Log Format

6.1 Log Structure

Audit logs shall be maintained in a structured JSON format, capturing the following fields:

  • Log ID: Unique identifier for each log entry (format: UUID).
  • Timestamp: UTC timestamp of the log entry (format: ISO 8601).
  • Action: Description of the action performed (e.g., "Data Collected", "Data Processed").
  • User ID: Identifier of the user or system performing the action.
  • Affected Data ID: Identifier of the affected data entry.

Example Log Entry: `json { "log_id": "f0e4d3c2-b3a2-4f4b-bd41-2b1d9b2e0f2a", "timestamp": "2023-10-01T12:00:00Z", "action": "Data Processed", "user_id": "admin", "affected_data_id": "e0b3e8e2-4c3e-4f4b-bd41-2b1d9b2e0f2a" } `

6.2 Log Retention Policy

Audit logs shall be retained for a minimum of 7 years to comply with ISO 14065 requirements. Logs shall be archived securely and made accessible for audit purposes.

6.3 Access Control

Access to audit logs shall be restricted to authorized personnel only. Role-based access control (RBAC) mechanisms shall be implemented to enforce access policies.

7. Conformity Assessment Procedures

Conformity assessment procedures shall be conducted periodically to ensure compliance with ISO 14064 and ISO 14065 standards. The following steps shall be taken:

  1. Internal Audits: Conduct regular internal audits of the MRV platform, focusing on data integrity, chain of custody, and compliance with documented procedures.
  2. External Audits: Engage an accredited third-party verification body to perform annual audits of the MRV platform.
  3. Corrective Actions: Document and implement corrective actions for any non-conformities identified during audits.
  4. Management Review: Conduct management reviews of audit findings and corrective actions to ensure continuous improvement.

8. Conclusion

This audit trail documentation establishes a comprehensive framework for tracking the entire lifecycle of environmental data collected by DaedArch Corporation's MRV platform. Compliance with ISO 14064 and ISO 14065 standards is critical for ensuring the integrity and transparency of carbon market operations. Adherence to the outlined procedures will facilitate a reliable verification chain of custody, promoting confidence among stakeholders in the carbon market.

---

This document is intended to be a living document and shall be reviewed and updated annually or as necessary to reflect changes in regulatory requirements or operational practices.

Organisation
ISO Technical Committee 207
Category
Standards Bodies
Doc type
Audit Trail Documentation
Word count
1190

The co-dependence network

Trellison Institute

Research and methodology.

Carbon capture research →

Artrellion

Policy and stakeholder engagement.

Carbon release arsenal →

LedgerWell

Operational verification.

Carbon business cases →

Disclosure: Draft document prepared for Artrellion stakeholder engagement. Transmittal requires governance approval and recipient-specific customisation.

← ISO Technical Committee 207 · All stakeholders